Orkney woman conscious during brain tumour operation
BBC News Scotland Monday, 5 July 2010 10:46 UK
Sally Heddle,
Patient
A retired teacher from
Orkney is recovering at home after having a brain tumour surgically removed while fully conscious. Sally Heddle is one of only three people who have elected to
have brain surgery at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary without general
anaesthetic. The procedure is carried out while the patient is conscious
so that surgeons can be guided by their reactions.
The 74-year-old was able to chat to medical staff during the
operation.The former teacher - who was made an OBE in 1992 for her
charity work - has amazed doctors by quickly regaining her speech. She described the operation as "extremely exciting". As far as I'm concerned this is a reprieve
and I'm making the most of it.
The surgery was carried out by a team led by consultant
neurosurgeon Mahmoud Kamel, who explained that the brain itself had no
pain receptors and did not feel pain like other parts of the body. He said brain surgery on a conscious patient meant that the
medical team were able to get instant feedback. Mrs Heddle was enthusiastic about the procedure. "I didn't hesitate for a minute," she said. "It was wonderful to have a role to play in my own brain
surgery."
Sally, who has Multiple Sclerosis, said that although she had
lost the ability to read and write the experience overall had been
positive. "There's no point in feeling sorry for yourself," she said."As far as I'm concerned this is a reprieve and I'm making
the most of it."
* * * * * *
Surgeons enter brain through eyelid
Published: June 26, 2010 at 11:15 PM
BALTIMORE, June 26 (UPI) -- Doctors at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore have pioneered a technique that can spare some patients invasive brain surgery. Liane Lefever, 47, of Manheim, Pa., was their 18th patient, The Baltimore Sun reported. Surgeons were able to remove a meningioma, a brain tumor, through an incision in her eyelid. "When you tell people you had brain surgery, the first thing people always do is look for a scar, and that's what's amazing, there isn't one," Lefever said.
Dr. Kofi Boahene, a facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon, first used the eyelid for access three years ago. He had to do a biopsy on a 14-month-old boy, who had a tumor that could not be reached by way of the nose -- which had already become an entrance point. "In surgery in general, we have a goal of doing things in a simpler way so patients recover more quickly and the cost is less," Boahene said.
In traditional brain surgery, still the most common, a patient's skull is sawn open. It involves lengthy recovery and the risk of damage to the brain.
Boahene and Dr. Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, who pioneered the nasal entrance point, recently published their first report on the eyelid incision.
TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA - Bill Attew's Life Transforming Operation extract from report by Jane Elliott, Health reporter, BBC News 20/06/2010 18:44
"I wasn't going to kill myself, but I thought if I don't wake up then OK. "One day I was in so much pain that I couldn't move my eyes. I was dribbling out of my mouth. I couldn't swallow."says Bill.
Then a friend of Bill's told him about an operation he had seen on TV - where a woman with a similar condition was cured. The friend traced the clip through the internet, and Bill made contact with the Spire Hospital in Bristol.
A week after his initial consultation Bill was booked in for an operation. As soon as he came round he noticed that the pain had vanished. "As I came out of theatre, I thought 'he's done it'," he said. "There was no pain and I needed no painkillers. "
Consultant, Mr Nik Patel, performed an operation to decompress the nerve - easing the pressure and lessening the pain. "It is a quite rare, but potentially under-diagnosed condition," said Mr Patel, a consultant neurosurgeon. It is estimated that 1 in 15,000 people suffer from trigeminal neuralgia.
"A lot of people would visit many practitioners before the condition is labelled and because it is quite rare a lot of people may not have seen a case to be able to diagnose it.
"In the majority of cases it is because a blood vessel is pressing on the trigeminal nerve - the largest of the brain nerves and it serves two functions - to transmit sensory functions from the face to the brain, specifically touch and pain. It also supplies the muscles that help us chew." He said the pain was probably "the worst pain imaginable". And he said that although the operation has been carried out for over a decade it was still not widely known, with only a handful of surgeons carrying it out.
Jillie Abbott, chairman of the Trigeminal Neuralgia Association, agreed: "Thankfully, the incidence of Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is rare but because of this the association struggles to get its message out to GPs, dentists and specialists, many of whom are shockingly ignorant about the condition and its treatments. "But many others who could be fast-tracked for surgery are just being prescribed higher and higher doses of drugs, and are left to suffer in pain."
Read Full Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/10341944.stm
* * * * * * * * *
05.06.10 Simon Cox on BBC Radio 4's The Report
Making more cancer drugs available could cost far
more than government estimates according to a BBC investigation The
government has allowed for a £200m cancer drug fund to pay for more
cancer treatments from next year.
But the cost could rise to
£600m based on figures from drug manufacturers and the National
Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
The higher figure
covers drugs turned down by NICE in the past five years.
Prof
Chris McCabe, of the University of Leeds, said the cancer fund, which
is due to start in April 2011, would not meet the need for access to
cancer drugs.
"If you think about the cost of some drugs being
£20,000 to £40,000 per patient for a year, you can get through £200m
very quickly," he told Radio 4's The Report.
"It is going to be
worse than it was before, because patients will believe the government
has said they can have any cancer drug the doctor thinks they need and
very quickly you will have patients being told by their doctor, 'Well I
think you need it but that fund has run out," he added.
More money for cancer, means less money for motor neurone disease.
More money for cancer means less to treat patients who have got
Alzheimer's Prof Alan Maynard, University of York
June 2010 Scientists want genetic
testing of tumours to be done routinely
NHS patients are to be
offered personalised cancer treatment under a pilot scheme to carry out
genetic tests on individuals' tumours.
Cancer Research UK hope that the project will analyse the
tumours of up to 6,000 patients a year for a range of genetic defects.The results will guide doctors in choosing the most effective
therapy for that patient.The charity predicts such tests could become routine within
five years.
Due to be launched in the autumn, the project will examine how
best to roll out genetic testing across the NHS.Six centres will be set up around the country where scientists
will classify a patient's tumour according to the specific genetic
mutations it carries.
Patients will have their tumours
genetically tested, and will receive treatments based on the evidence of
what does and doesn't work for their type of tumour. James PeachCancer
Research UK
Patients will then be offered drug treatment based on the
genetic make-up of their cancer.
Brown Promises One to One Care for Cancer Patients But Can He Deliver ?
8/02/10 Today at a speech given at think tank The King’s Fund, Gordon Brown announced plans for every cancer patient to have one-to-one care at home from specialist nurses. The plan will affect 1.6m patients and cost £100m over five years but Labour has insisted that by moving care from hospitals to the community and avoiding emergency admissions, the NHS can save £2.7bn a year.
Following the announcement, NHS chief executive David Nicholson has ordered staff to begin making the £20bn of savings needed for growth in services over the next five years and the Department of Health has said it will be investing £20m in 2011-12 to work with Macmillan Cancer Support to introduce more specialist cancer posts and to assess the options for ‘different models of one-to-one support’, which will help identify the most cost-effective approach.
The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have claimed that this plan is a pre-election ‘bribe’, and have questioned how it would be funded. Andrew Lansley, the Conservative party shadow health secretary, said that given the Government is planning further cuts to NHS spending in the future, he is worried ‘they are not being straight with the public’ and questioned how the Government planned to pay for this plan.
29.09.09
HURRAH !! NHS to get specialist cancer unit
Proton therapy helps to treat cancers in the eye and the brain
Campaigners are welcoming a new move to invest in specialist cancer care for brain and spinal cord tumours.
Ministers in England have invited hospitals to bid to become the first national centre for proton therapy.
The treatment uses radiation to pinpoint cancerous cells without significantly damaging nearby tissue.
There
is already one unit in England, but it only treats the less complex eye
cancers, forcing many patients to go abroad and fund the care
themselves.
The treatment, which tends to be used
on children and those with tumours close to the most sensitive parts of
the brain and spinal cord, is available in the US and other European
countries, but the bill can often top £100,000.
Experts predict an NHS unit would be used by 400 people a year.
Proton
therapy is described as "the most precise form of radiation therapy" as
it pinpoints the cancerous cells without significantly damaging nearby
tissue.
Previously
patients or parents faced a terrible situation, forced to raise funds
to go abroad for lifesaving treatment, adding to the stress of a brain
tumour diagnosis
Wendy Fulcher, of Brain Tumour Research
It works by depositing energy in the target tumour. These electrons
damage the DNA of cancerous cells and ultimately cause their death.
The
existing proton therapy site at Clatterbridge, on the Wirral, uses a
low-energy machine which can only by used to reach cancers near the
eye.
Health minister Ann Keen said: "This is significant news
for patients with rare cancers, especially children, as having proton
therapy will mean that they will receive a better quality of treatment
and will not suffer from potential side-effects such hearing loss and
reduced IQ."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Neurosurgery faces a UK-wide shortage of middle-grade doctors
BBC Reports UK Neurosurgery staff shortage
Emergency neurosurgery at one of Wales' busiest hospitals is being transferred to Cardiff due to staffing problems.
Morriston
Hospital in Swansea had said some complex neurosurgery was to be
switched as it sought to pool resources with the University Hospital of
Wales.
Trust
bosses have said Morriston has only three middle-grade doctors instead
of seven due to a recruitment shortage, and this will drop to two in
August. A lack of qualified staff has also caused problems at
Swansea's Singleton Hospital, which is being forced to close two
children's wards. [18.07.09 Full report can be on BBC online news ]
* * * * * * * * *
2 Psychosexual support for cancer patients New Macmillan survey published 20/05/09 shows thatmany cancer patients are unable to rebuild their lives
because they are not receiving the they are
entitled to, a charity says.
Three-quarters of patients surveyed by Macmillan Cancer Support said their sexual relationships had been affected.
Survey facts: 1/3 are unable to speak to their partner about this problem. Half are put off starting a new relationship One in seven couples separated permanently as result of cancer
Two thirds said their doctor had not spoken to them about this. Most
had not been offered any advice by professionals despite national
guidelines stating they should have access to this kind of counselling.
The charity wants to encourage patients to speak out about their problems. It says there is currently a silence surrounding the impact cancer has on sexual relationships.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Does Cancer Cause Depression in Patients ? 19/05/09
New U.S. research into depression in rats with cancer reports that cancer itself may be a cause of depression. A University of Chicago team found tumours produce chemicals which can produce negative moods swings. The study, carried out on rats,has shown there may be biochemical reasons - quite apart from the mental trauma of diagnosis.This suggests that depression in human cancer patients may be caused by cancer.
"In this case, examining behavioural responses to tumours in
non-human animals is particularly useful because the rats have no
awareness of the disease, and thus their behavioural changes were
likely the result of purely biological factors."
About
one in 10 people with cancer gets clinical depression and the root
causes are likely to be complex, but this study provides an intriguing
suggestion that the cancer itself may have a part to play.
Cancer
Research UK senior science information officer Dr Alison Ross commented: "As
this study looking at cancer and depression was carried out in rats, we
don't know whether the results will hold true in cancer patients."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Drug approval for NHS to speed up
The government is to set out plans to speed approval of drugs used in the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
From BBC News Online: The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) can
take up to two years to make a decision but ministers want this cut to
six months. Patients will have their legal rights to drugs
recommended by NICE laid out in the NHS constitution to tackle the
"postcode lottery". And health trusts will no longer be able to refuse drugs on cost alone. BBC June 2008
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Government warned on DIY cancer treatments
· Rise in availability of unproven drugs online causes increasing concern as patients go online to buy dodgy drugs that may poison or kill rather than cure.
A colour enhanced scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a breast cancer cell. Photograph: Science photo library
The
government was yesterday warned that cancer sufferers are at increased
risk from websites selling unproven cures that could wreck the
remaining months of their life. The controversy centres on a drug
called DCA (dichloroacetate), a chemical being promoted and hyped
across the world as a cure for cancer after news of preliminary
laboratory tests on rats.
Dr Ian Gibson, chairman of the
all-party parliamentary group on cancer, warned that increasing numbers
of British people were purchasing such products, and urged the
government to do all it could to highlight the problem and block sales
from the websites. The proliferation of such sites was "an increasing
problem which started in the United States and is growing almost daily
here," he said.
DCA is a cheap off-patent chemical which was the subject of various
largely unpromising trials for different diseases dating back around 20
years. It came back to prominence after research on early animal
laboratory work by two scientists in Canada was published in the Cancer
Cell journal in January last year.
The research by Dr Evangelos
Michelakis and his colleague Dr Sebastian Bonnet showed regression of
several types of cancer tumour, including brain, breast and lung, with
no effect on healthy tissue. Their theory is that DCA restores the
mitochondrial function, responsible for energy production, in cells
damaged by cancers, allowing them to self-destruct and decreasing
tumour growth. If they are right, they may have hit on a new approach
to cancer treatment.
Subsequently, Jim Tassano, who runs a
pest-control business in California, began to manufacture and sell DCA
to all-comers on a website. The US authorities have attempted to stop a
California-based website selling the drug, but the Guardian was easily
able to obtain a tub of the powdered chemical, with a recommendation to
try it with caffeine from strong tea and coffee. Tassano says he only
wants to help people who have run out of options.
One of the
scientists researching DCA's effect on cancerous cells is appalled.
"The concern about this drug is that at this stage it is given to
people who are very sick. Unsupervised, it could kill you," said Dr
Michelakis, a professor at the University of Alberta who carried out
tests in animal brain, lung and breast tumours and is now moving into
human trials.
Tassano said in an email to the Guardian: "I am
reluctant to speak publicly due to FDA [Food and Drug Administration]
issues ... They have made it clear that they do not like high profile
people. I am in a tough spot running both the information site on DCA
and being involved with it economically as well. If the FDA takes
action against me, it will be a big setback for DCA and cancer
patients. I hope you understand."
The sale of DCA underscores how
difficult it is for authorities to stop people purchasing potentially
dangerous drugs on the internet. Gibson said he was very concerned that
patients were being given false advice and erroneous information about
drugs that had not been tested on humans. "I'm calling for these
websites to be researched by the Department of Health and closed down
instantly.
"We need to start a campaign to get the message out
there that these sites are no good. If need be, we should be talking to
the cancer institutes and charities in America to see what pressure
they can bring to have the sites closed. But it's a very difficult
thing to do. People will always turn to sites like these when they are
desperate, so we need to make sure they know the facts."
Michelakis
is moving as fast as he can into human clinical trials that will start
to give some real answers. "The people who decide to sell this are like
drug dealers. They are targeting the most vulnerable people you can
imagine," he said.
Tassano and others believe those with terminal
cancer should be allowed to take what risks they choose. Most doctors
think patients should take calculated risks only within clinical
trials, where they can be properly looked after if things go wrong.
Two
doctors in Canada have broken ranks. Akhbar Khan, a GP, and his wife
Humaira Khan, whose background is in public health, offer DCA at their
Toronto clinic. They have been criticised by other doctors and
regulatory bodies, but are allowed to use the drug because, although
DCA is not approved as a cancer treatment, it is licensed for metabolic
diseases.
Most of their patients are from Canada and the US, but some have made the trip from the UK.
"We
haven't seen it cure anyone. It has prolonged life and given a better
quality of life," said Dr Humaira Khan. "There's also the psychological
aspect: the family feels they are doing something."
The couple
are adding other unproven drugs to their repertoire as they hear about
them. "The patients out there are researching like crazy and finding
all sorts of things on the internet. They bring me lots of literature,"
said Dr Akhbar Khan.
On the basis of a few patients who said they
had positive results from DCA and drank a lot of black tea and coffee,
Tassano suggested that people try "the caffeine protocol". Yet he now
warns on the site that the idea has resulted in death for some
patients. "We are seeing very severe responses to the DCA-caffeine
protocol in brain cancer patients. We have heard reports of a couple of
people who were on high doses of DCA that started drinking caffeine and
had very severe reactions: seizures and death followed," he said.
Dr
Kat Arney of Cancer Research UK said the scenario around DCA was
"probably the worst thing possible". "Cancer patients are taking this
drug with no idea if it is safe, or at what dosage. It could make them
very ill indeed."
The Department of Health said responsibility
for websites selling medicines rested with the Medicines and Healthcare
Regulatory Authority (MHRA). The MHRA in a statement said websites
operating illegally in the UK had been closed down and said it was
making efforts to alert consumers to the dangers of buying any
medicines through the web.
Published with kind permission of The Guardian newspaper.This article appeared in the Guardian
on Monday April 28 2008 on p1 of the Top stories section. It was last updated at 11:32 on April 28 2008.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Late
diagnosis is seen as a major reason why the UK has poorer survival
rates than some other countries in Europe.
Patients are dying of cancer
because GPs are failing to identify their symptoms, the government's
top cancer expert has warned. Professor Mike Richards said botched
diagnoses were now 'a significant concern'. The
government's recent Cancer Reform Strategy identified late diagnosis as
a major reason why the UK has poorer survival rates than some other
countries in Europe. Although the cancer death rate is falling, it
killed 153,491 Britons in 2005.
'There are 250,000 new patients
with cancer every year,' said Prof Richards. 'It's probably only a small
proportion who experience a missed or delayed diagnosis. It's a small
minority of patients overall. But it's not a negligible figure. We want
to reduce this to the smallest possible number.' There are no official annual
statistics on the scale of the problem. But an unpublished joint study
by the Health Department and the National Patient Safety Agency, which
investigated records involving missed or late diagnoses of cancer
patients from January 2004 to November 2006, showed: · More
than 1,900 patients - 55 a month - suffered a missed or late diagnosis,
though officials admitted the problem was probably much greater; · Patients
waited for periods between a day and 23 months to have their condition
confirmed because of diagnostic errors, often at their GP's surgery; · Breast, bowel and lung cancer were the likeliest to involve a botched diagnoses; · Blunders
in hospitals added to delays in cancers being identified. These include
X-rays, biopsies or blood tests misfiled or misread.
Richards said some
GPs felt they could not refer patients for tests as often as they would
like in case hospitals became overloaded. 'Many patients are referred
the first time they go to their GP. But some will go three, four, or
even more times,' he said. Cancer experts agree it can be hard for GPs to
identify correctly the signs of the disease, partly because the
symptoms of certain cancers are also those associated with many other
illnesses. A typical GP with a list of 1,800 patients will only see
eight or nine new cancer patients every year, and there are about 200
different types of cancer. 'Cancer is difficult to identify and
GPs sometimes get it wrong,' said Dr Steve Field, a Birmingham GP and
the chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Many of the
signs of cancer, such as tiredness, weight loss and rectal bleeding,
are also associated with many other conditions, making diagnosis
difficult, Field said. (shortened version of report pub. The Observer, Sunday 13 Apr.08)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Post-menopausal hormone therapy may raise risk of meningioma
Last Updated: 2008-02-07 13:55:02 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Karla Gale NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Hormone replacement therapy
(HRT) appears to be associated with the occurrence of meningioma,
investigators at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, report in
the January 10th issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
"I became interested in this subject when our Southwest Oncology
Group found that tamoxifen (an estrogen blocker) showed modest evidence
of efficacy in delaying meningioma growth in some individuals," Dr.
Kurt A. Jaeckle told Reuters Health. Multiple lines of evidence link meningioma with female hormones, the
researcher added, including expression of estrogen and progesterone
receptors and higher incidence in women and in patients with breast
cancer."So there is a logical, albeit unproven, connection," he said.
To investigate the relationship between a diagnosis of meningioma
and HRT use, Dr. Jaeckle's team reviewed records for the 355,318 women
ages 26 to 86 years treated at their clinic between 1993 and 2003. Of
these, 18,037 were current or past users of HRT. They identified 1390 patients with a history of either symptomatic
meningioma or clinically silent meningioma incidentally discovered on
brain MRI. Overall, the prevalence of meningioma was 865 per 100,000 in HRT
users and 366 per 100,000 in nonusers (adjusted odds ratio 2.2, p <
.0001). The association appeared to be stronger among younger women,
with an odds ratio of 4.1 for those aged 26 to 55 years.
For now, this issue is just one of many that the physician should
consider in weighing the potential benefits and risks of HRT, Dr.
Jaeckle advised. That said, important questions remain to be answered. "If a woman
has an 'atypical' malignant or recurrent meningioma and is on HRT,
should the HRT be stopped (or not started)? Do any of the benign
meningiomas convert to more fast growing tumors if a patient is on HRT?"
Dr. Jaeckle and his associates are actively pursuing answers. "We
are planning laboratory studies (eg, gene microarray analysis) to try
to identify genetic profiles that predispose women to develop these
tumors -- and ideally, whether particular gene patterns would identify
women in whom oral contraceptives and HRT should be avoided --
presuming there is a cause-and-effect relationship." Until there is direct evidence of a link between HRT and a more
malignant profile, he concluded, "I want to reassure women that in the
absence of this information there is no call for alarm."
Brain Tumour Gene Link Found
22 Feb 2008
Cancer Research UK funded scientists have discovered a mutation in
a DNA repair gene which may increase the risk of developing meningioma,
a rare type of brain tumour, according to new research published in the
latest edition of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The researchers, based at The Institute of Cancer Research, explored
136 DNA repair genes before they homed in on a mutation in the gene
BRIP1 - a gene also associated with increased breast cancer risk. This
mutation may account for 16 per cent of meningiomas. More than 7,500 people are diagnosed with malignant or benign brain
tumours in the UK each year. Meninigiomas account for over 30 per cent
of these, yet little is known about the cause of the disease which
tends to affect older people, and women. The vast majority of meningiomas are benign. They grow slowly in the
tissues of the brain or spinal cord and as a result do not respond well
to chemotherapy and cannot always be safely removed by surgery.
The new study examined genetic differences in the brains of 1,268
people from four European countries. Data from 631 patients with
meningiomas was compared with 637 healthy individuals. Previous US
research had analysed a small sample of just 200 people, making this is
the largest study of gene involvement in meningioma risk.
Lead researcher, Professor Richard Houlston, based at The Institute of
Cancer Research, said: "Using a large sample, we have identified a new
region associated with meningioma risk. However, further investigation
into the functions of BRIP1, could shed more light on the relationship
between the gene and brain tumour growth. Currently, the only sure way to diagnose many brain tumours is by
biopsy. Research like ours, which examines gene changes may offer the
hope of non-invasive ways to diagnose the disease and new tailored
treatments for brain cancer patients."
Dr Lesley Walker, Cancer Research UK's director of cancer information,
said: "Although meningioma is a rare condition, we welcome any insight
that helps us to understand it further. This study has shown some very
interesting results. However, further studies are needed to explain how
additional changes in the BRIP1 gene may also contribute to the growth
of these tumours."
Notes - Ninety percent of meningiomas are benign, 6% are atypical, and 2% are
malignant. The word benign is misleading in this case as, when benign
tumours grow and constrict the brain, they can cause disability and
even be life threatening.
- Cancer Research UK is also funding a series of genome-wide studies in
other cancers because it hopes to identify people who are at increased
risk of developing the disease and eventually prevent it from
occurring. The first results from the breast and bowel cancer studies
have already been announced.
- The tendency of cancers to affect family groups cannot be wholly
explained by rare, high-risk, inherited mutations. A substantial
proportion of such cancers are thought to be attributable to the
combined effects of multiple, common gene variants, known as
polymorphisms, each of which is associated with a small increase in
cancer risk. The search for these polymorphisms is being facilitated by
the availability of the human genome sequence and the development of
high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology,
as used in this study.
About The Institute of Cancer Research
- The Institute of Cancer Research is Europe's leading cancer research
centre with expert scientists working on cutting edge research. It was
founded in 1909 to carry out research into the causes of cancer and to
develop new strategies for its prevention, diagnosis, treatment and
care. Website at: www.icr.ac.uk. - The Institute is a charity that relies on voluntary income. The
Institute is one of the world's most cost-effective major cancer
research organisations with over 90p in every £ directly supporting
research.